← Community Funding Map

BIRRONG, NSW

2143Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 1/10LGA: CumberlandView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
115
Total Funding
$11.8M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$829K
G: $11K C: $819K
$571K
C: $571K
$263K
C: $263K
$211K
C: $211K
$164K
C: $164K
$98K
C: $98K
$88K
C: $88K
$65K
C: $65K
$64K
C: $64K
$41K
C: $41K
$15K
C: $15K
$12K
C: $12K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
4,591
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
91 disability-focused enterprises in NSW

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether BIRRONG, NSW sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In NSW
Far West49 providers
Far West51 providers
Southern NSW242 providers
Southern NSW245 providers
Captured Markets
Far West95%
Mid North Coast89%
Western NSW75%
Murrumbidgee71%

Schools (7)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 2143. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Regents Park Christian School
IndependentCombined1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1039
731 students
Birrong Girls High School
GovernmentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 956
726 students
Birrong Public School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 967
451 students
St Peter Chanel Catholic Primary School
CatholicPrimary
ICSEA 1048
383 students
Birrong Boys High School
GovernmentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 937
366 students
Regents Park Public School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 968
268 students
Karningul School
GovernmentSpecial10% Indigenous
ICSEA 919
20 students

NDIS Participants

Cumberland (A) LGA
5,926
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (115)

Disadvantage Index

1/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area is in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally. Community-controlled funding is critical here.

Entity Types

Company
91
Charity
22
Foundation
1
Govt
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 115 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.