← Community Funding Map

Penguin - Sulphur Creek, TAS

7316Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: BurnieView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
54
Total Funding
$13.5M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$13.2M
C: $13.2M
$190K
C: $190K
$45K
C: $45K
$32K
C: $32K
$11K
C: $11K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Penguin - Sulphur Creek, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%

Schools (3)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 7316. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Penguin District School
GovernmentCombined20% Indigenous
ICSEA 960
676 students
North West Christian School
IndependentCombined20% Indigenous
ICSEA 985
123 students
Riana Primary School
GovernmentPrimary19% Indigenous
ICSEA 960
86 students

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
4,960
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
1,580
Age Pension
935
Health Care Card
370
Family Tax Benefit A
320
Disability Support Pension
315
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
280
Family Tax Benefit B
240
JobSeeker Payment
225
Carer Allowance
220
Carer Payment
125

NDIS Participants

Burnie (C) LGA
738
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (54)

Disadvantage Index

5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
44
Charity
8
person
2

Gap Alert

This postcode has 54 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.