← Community Funding Map
Sheffield - Railton, TAS
7306Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 3/10LGA: Waratah-WynyardView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
55
Total Funding
$230K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
Robert Read
Company
$63K
C: $63K
Kentish Regional Clinic Inc
Charity
$55K
G: $55K
MOUNT ROLAND LAND CARE INC
Charity
$36K
G: $36K
TASVALVE PTY. LTD.
Company
$26K
C: $26K
$20K
C: $20K
Chaffeys Chains
Company
$19K
C: $19K
COMMUNITY MATTERS PTY LTD
Company
$11K
C: $11K
PETER GROOM
Company
$300
G: $300
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Sheffield - Railton, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%
Schools (1)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 7306. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Sheffield School
GovernmentCombined16% Indigenous
ICSEA 921
365 students
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
3,755
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
1,220
Age Pension
680
Health Care Card
275
Disability Support Pension
265
Family Tax Benefit A
235
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
215
Family Tax Benefit B
170
Carer Allowance
170
JobSeeker Payment
165
Carer Payment
110
All Entities (55)
Charity
Charity
Charity
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
+ 25 more entities
Disadvantage Index
3/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 41
- Charity
- 14
Gap Alert
This postcode has 55 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.