← Community Funding Map

ACTON PARK, TAS

7170Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: ClarenceView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
81
Total Funding
$46.1M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$34.6M
G: $59K C: $34.5M
$2.2M
C: $2.2M
$2.1M
C: $2.1M
$2.1M
C: $2.1M
$504K
C: $504K
$423K
G: $173K C: $250K
$351K
C: $351K
$155K
G: $37K C: $118K
$151K
C: $151K
$143K
C: $143K
$135K
C: $135K
$110K
C: $110K
$72K
C: $72K
$45K
C: $45K
$39K
C: $39K
$39K
C: $39K
$29K
C: $29K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether ACTON PARK, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%

Schools (1)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 7170. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Cambridge Primary School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1041
350 students

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
2,595
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
765
Age Pension
550
Health Care Card
230
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
180
Family Tax Benefit A
145
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
130
Carer Allowance
120
Disability Support Pension
105
Family Tax Benefit B
95
JobSeeker Payment
90

NDIS Participants

Clarence (C) LGA
1,769
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (81)

Disadvantage Index

10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
74
Charity
4
person
2
Foundation
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 81 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.