← Community Funding Map
Dardanup, WA
6236Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 8/10LGA: DardanupView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
33
Total Funding
$25K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
$25K
G: $25K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
1,279
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
2
Local Disability Delivery
0
10 disability-focused enterprises in WA
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Dardanup, WA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In WA
Goldfields-Esperance44 providers
Goldfields-Esperance44 providers
Midwest-Gascoyne61 providers
Great Southern64 providers
Captured Markets
Goldfields-Esperance100%
Midwest-Gascoyne99%
Kimberley-Pilbara99%
Great Southern97%
Schools (2)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 6236. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Dardanup Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1004
221 students
Our Lady of Lourdes School
CatholicPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1032
195 students
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
1,100
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
325
Age Pension
215
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
95
Family Tax Benefit A
75
Health Care Card
70
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
65
Family Tax Benefit B
50
Disability Support Pension
50
JobSeeker Payment
40
Carer Allowance
40
NDIS Participants
Dardanup (S) LGA
404
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (33)
Company
Foundation
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Social Enterprise
Charity
Company
Company
+ 3 more entities
Disadvantage Index
8/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 25
- Charity
- 6
- Foundation
- 1
- Social Enterprise
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 33 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.