← Community Funding Map

Port Kennedy, WA

6172Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 4/10LGA: RockinghamView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
54
Total Funding
$9.5M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$823K
C: $823K
$540K
G: $31K C: $509K
$370K
C: $370K
$350K
C: $350K
$338K
G: $34K C: $304K
$269K
C: $269K
$262K
C: $262K
$142K
C: $142K
$58K
C: $58K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
1,279
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
2
Local Disability Delivery
0
10 disability-focused enterprises in WA

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Port Kennedy, WA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In WA
Goldfields-Esperance44 providers
Goldfields-Esperance44 providers
Midwest-Gascoyne61 providers
Great Southern64 providers
Captured Markets
Goldfields-Esperance100%
Midwest-Gascoyne99%
Kimberley-Pilbara99%
Great Southern97%

Schools (6)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 6172. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Rockingham Lakes Primary School
GovernmentPrimary7% Indigenous
ICSEA 952
450 students
St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School
CatholicPrimary5% Indigenous
ICSEA 1029
408 students
Endeavour Primary School
GovernmentPrimary11% Indigenous
ICSEA 957
387 students
Port Kennedy Primary School
GovernmentPrimary10% Indigenous
ICSEA 956
362 students
Peel Language Development School
GovernmentSpecial13% Indigenous
ICSEA 935
265 students
Endeavour Education Support Centre
GovernmentSpecial15% Indigenous
ICSEA 895
92 students

NDIS Participants

Rockingham (C) LGA
4,341
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (54)

Disadvantage Index

4/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
42
Charity
11
Social Enterprise
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 54 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.