← Community Funding Map

WINDSOR, SA

5501Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: WakefieldView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
69
Total Funding
$163K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
2 social & Indigenous enterprisesoperating in this area
Browse →

Top Funded Entities

$80K
C: $80K
$70K
C: $70K
PLASMA ART
Company
$13K
C: $13K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
958
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
21 disability-focused enterprises in SA

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether WINDSOR, SA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In SA
Far North (SA)49 providers
Far North (SA)50 providers
Eyre and Western62 providers
Eyre and Western67 providers
Captured Markets
Barossa, Light and Lower North97%
Far North (SA)97%
Fleurieu and Kangaroo Island92%
Limestone Coast91%

Social & Indigenous Enterprises (2)

Two Wells Craft Shop
sacommunity-classifiedABN 25018406393

Operates as an opportunity shop selling donated goods and crafts to raise funds for heritage restoration of Two Wells Courthouse and community projects.

retailcommunity-development
Two Wells Uniting Church 'Treasure Trove' Op Shop
sacommunity-classifiedABN 61314260600

Operates an op shop selling donated secondhand goods to generate revenue that supports the church’s community and charitable mission.

retail
Browse all in SA →

Schools (1)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 5501. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Two Wells Primary School
GovernmentPrimary9% Indigenous
ICSEA 932
247 students

NDIS Participants

Wakefield (DC) LGA
257
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (69)

Disadvantage Index

5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
59
Charity
7
Govt
2
Social Enterprise
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 69 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.