← Community Funding Map
Yankalilla, SA
5204Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 4/10LGA: YankalillaView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
31
Total Funding
$314K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
GEKA ENTERPRISES PTY LTD
Company
$258K
C: $258K
APOLLO FLOAT TANKS PTY LTD
Company
$35K
C: $35K
Pure Outback
Company
$11K
C: $11K
Papers 'N Putors Pty Ltd
Company
$10K
C: $10K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
958
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
21 disability-focused enterprises in SA
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Yankalilla, SA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In SA
Far North (SA)49 providers
Far North (SA)50 providers
Eyre and Western62 providers
Eyre and Western67 providers
Captured Markets
Barossa, Light and Lower North97%
Far North (SA)97%
Fleurieu and Kangaroo Island92%
Limestone Coast91%
Schools (1)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 5204. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Rapid Bay Primary School
GovernmentPrimary10% Indigenous
ICSEA 975
29 students
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
3,630
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
1,255
Age Pension
850
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
250
Health Care Card
190
JobSeeker Payment
185
Disability Support Pension
180
Family Tax Benefit A
155
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
145
Carer Allowance
130
Family Tax Benefit B
120
NDIS Participants
Yankalilla (DC) LGA
165
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (31)
Charity
Charity
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
+ 1 more entities
Disadvantage Index
4/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 26
- Charity
- 4
- Govt
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 31 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.