← Community Funding Map
St Agnes - Ridgehaven, SA
5091Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 8/10LGA: Tea Tree GullyView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
63
Total Funding
$17.2M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
$16.3M
C: $16.3M
Fervent Blue
Company
$549K
C: $549K
Brewerton & Associates
Company
$272K
C: $272K
TRANSTAINER
Company
$48K
C: $48K
Lions Medical Research Foundation Inc.
Foundation
$35K
G: $35K
SAMANTHA GIBSON
person
$22K
C: $22K
FT MOBILITY
Company
$17K
C: $17K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
958
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
21 disability-focused enterprises in SA
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether St Agnes - Ridgehaven, SA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In SA
Far North (SA)49 providers
Far North (SA)50 providers
Eyre and Western62 providers
Eyre and Western67 providers
Captured Markets
Barossa, Light and Lower North97%
Far North (SA)97%
Fleurieu and Kangaroo Island92%
Limestone Coast91%
Schools (4)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 5091. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Banksia Park International High School
GovernmentSecondary4% Indigenous
ICSEA 1009
1,055 students
Saint David's Parish School
CatholicPrimary3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1063
306 students
Banksia Park School R-6
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1037
240 students
Tea Tree Gully Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1073
117 students
NDIS Participants
Tea Tree Gully (C) LGA
3,493
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (63)
Charity
Charity
Charity
Foundation
Foundation
Company
Company
Company
Company
+ 33 more entities
Disadvantage Index
8/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 50
- Charity
- 7
- Govt
- 3
- Foundation
- 2
- person
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 63 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.