← Community Funding Map
BRYDEN, QLD
4312Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 2/10LGA: SomersetView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
59
Total Funding
$8.4M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
Somerset Regional Council
Company
$6.6M
G: $6.4M C: $204K
Lions Club of Esk Inc
Company
$605K
G: $169K C: $436K
$241K
G: $241K
Esk Men's Shed Inc.
Charity
$104K
G: $104K
$103K
G: $103K
$91K
G: $91K
$86K
G: $86K
$79K
G: $79K
Somerset Assist Inc.
Charity
$70K
G: $70K
ESK COMMUNITY CHOIR INC.
Company
$70K
G: $70K
ESK JOCKEY CLUB INC.
Company
$64K
G: $64K
ESK TENNIS CLUB INC.
Company
$61K
G: $61K
ESK COUNTRY GOLF CLUB INC
Company
$57K
G: $57K
$47K
G: $47K
$35K
G: $35K
CARE4ESK INC.
Company
$32K
G: $32K
ESK HOSPITAL AUXILIARY INC
Company
$16K
G: $16K
ESK NEWSAGENCY
Company
$14K
G: $14K
$13K
G: $13K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
2,641
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
43 disability-focused enterprises in QLD
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether BRYDEN, QLD sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In QLD
Mackay155 providers
Mackay155 providers
Bundaberg157 providers
Bundaberg159 providers
Captured Markets
Bundaberg87%
Cairns81%
Maryborough80%
Rockhampton78%
Schools (1)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 4312. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Esk State School
GovernmentPrimary15% Indigenous
ICSEA 970
140 students
NDIS Participants
Somerset (R) LGA
886
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (59)
Charity
Charity
Company
Company
Charity
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
+ 29 more entities
Disadvantage Index
2/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area is in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally. Community-controlled funding is critical here.
Entity Types
- Company
- 49
- Charity
- 9
- Govt
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 59 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.