← Community Funding Map

Salisbury - Nathan, QLD

4111Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 9/10LGA: BrisbaneView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
36
Total Funding
$4.1M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
2,641
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
43 disability-focused enterprises in QLD

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Salisbury - Nathan, QLD sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In QLD
Mackay155 providers
Mackay155 providers
Bundaberg157 providers
Bundaberg159 providers
Captured Markets
Bundaberg87%
Cairns81%
Maryborough80%
Rockhampton78%

Crime & Safety — Brisbane LGA

Reported incidents by offence group (March 2025 - February 2026). Source: state crime statistics agencies.

Theft
88 per 100K
88,774
Drug offences
40 per 100K
40,456
Break and enter
26 per 100K
26,457
Assault
24 per 100K
19,780
Traffic offences
19 per 100K
16,204
Against justice procedures
44 per 100K
14,728
Disorderly conduct
22 per 100K
14,644
Fraud
11 per 100K
11,376
Property damage
23 per 100K
7,795
Sexual Offences
8 per 100K
4,140

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
580
Payment Types
15
Health Care Card
105
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
95
Pension Concession Card
95
Youth Allowance (student and apprentice)
75
Age Pension
55
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
30
JobSeeker Payment
30
Family Tax Benefit A
25
Disability Support Pension
20
Family Tax Benefit B
20

NDIS Participants

Brisbane (C) LGA
29,711
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (36)

Disadvantage Index

9/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
28
Charity
8

Gap Alert

This postcode has 36 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.