← Community Funding Map
Leongatha, VIC
3953Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: Baw BawView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
114
Total Funding
$1.2M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
$517K
C: $517K
$193K
C: $193K
$166K
C: $166K
$153K
C: $153K
LEONGATHA MEN'S SHED INC
Charity
$37K
G: $37K
$30K
G: $30K
$15K
G: $15K
$13K
G: $13K
Woorayl Lodge Inc
Charity
$10K
G: $10K
$10K
G: $10K
$9K
G: $9K
$9K
G: $9K
$1K
G: $1K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Leongatha, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Schools (5)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 3953. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Leongatha Secondary College
GovernmentSecondary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 991
607 students
Leongatha Primary School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1008
582 students
Mary MacKillop Catholic Regional College
CatholicSecondary3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1032
544 students
St Laurence O'Toole School
CatholicPrimary3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1041
180 students
South Gippsland Specialist School
GovernmentSpecial10% Indigenous
ICSEA 952
67 students
NDIS Participants
Baw Baw (S) LGA
2,125
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (114)
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
Charity
+ 84 more entities
Disadvantage Index
5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 81
- Charity
- 28
- Foundation
- 4
- Social Enterprise
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 114 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.