← Community Funding Map
BOXWOOD, VIC
3725Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 7/10LGA: Greater SheppartonView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
7
Total Funding
—
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether BOXWOOD, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Greater Shepparton LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
10197 per 100K
7,192
Theft
342 per 100K
1,976
Against justice procedures
854 per 100K
1,792
Assault
452 per 100K
887
Property damage
479 per 100K
729
Break and enter
85 per 100K
626
Drug offences
118 per 100K
312
Other person offences
31 per 100K
252
Weapons offences
78 per 100K
222
Fraud
27 per 100K
156
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
390
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
120
Age Pension
75
Disability Support Pension
25
Family Tax Benefit A
25
Health Care Card
25
Carer Allowance
20
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
20
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
20
Family Tax Benefit B
15
JobSeeker Payment
15
NDIS Participants
Greater Shepparton (C) LGA
2,806
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (7)
Disadvantage Index
7/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 6
- Charity
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 7 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.