← Community Funding Map

CHINANGIN, VIC

3544Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: BulokeView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
7
Total Funding
$529K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$529K
G: $518K C: $11K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether CHINANGIN, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Crime & Safety — Buloke LGA

Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.

Total
3518 per 100K
207
Theft
153 per 100K
88
Break and enter
34 per 100K
31
Against justice procedures
187 per 100K
28
Property damage
170 per 100K
21
Assault
51 per 100K
17
Other person offences
17 per 100K
9
Weapons offences
85 per 100K
5
Drug offences
34 per 100K
4
Disorderly conduct
17 per 100K
3

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
230
Payment Types
14
Pension Concession Card
75
Age Pension
40
Family Tax Benefit A
15
Disability Support Pension
15
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
10
Carer Payment
10
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
10
JobSeeker Payment
10
Family Tax Benefit B
10
Carer Allowance
10

NDIS Participants

Buloke (S) LGA
165
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (7)

Disadvantage Index

5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
6
Charity
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 7 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.