← Community Funding Map
NELSON, VIC
3292Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 6/10LGA: GlenelgView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
11
Total Funding
—
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether NELSON, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Glenelg LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
9010 per 100K
1,804
Theft
295 per 100K
446
Against justice procedures
632 per 100K
353
Property damage
579 per 100K
247
Assault
345 per 100K
221
Break and enter
65 per 100K
157
Other person offences
21 per 100K
83
Drug offences
118 per 100K
71
Weapons offences
130 per 100K
68
Sexual Offences
270 per 100K
54
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
220
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
75
Age Pension
45
Disability Support Pension
15
JobSeeker Payment
10
Carer Allowance
10
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
10
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
10
Health Care Card
10
Family Tax Benefit A
5
Parenting Payment Partnered
5
NDIS Participants
Glenelg (S) LGA
657
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (11)
Charity
Charity
Company
Company
Company
Disadvantage Index
6/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 9
- Charity
- 2
Gap Alert
This postcode has 11 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.