← Community Funding Map

CLARINDA, VIC

3169Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 3/10LGA: Kingston (Vic.)View on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
146
Total Funding
$480.1M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$361.5M
C: $361.5M
$84.5M
C: $84.5M
$30.4M
C: $30.4M
$842K
C: $842K
$711K
G: $46K C: $665K
$519K
C: $519K
$345K
C: $345K
$132K
G: $97K C: $35K
$74K
C: $74K
Kidsafe Vic Inc
Foundation
$63K
G: $63K
$33K
C: $33K
$16K
C: $16K
$14K
C: $14K
$10K
C: $10K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether CLARINDA, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Schools (7)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 3169. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Christway College
IndependentCombined
ICSEA 1111
864 students
Westall Secondary College
GovernmentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 966
710 students
Clarinda Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1082
334 students
St Andrew's School
CatholicPrimary
ICSEA 1074
319 students
Westall Primary School
GovernmentPrimary3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1017
309 students
Clayton South Primary School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1008
102 students
Fitra Community School
IndependentPrimary
ICSEA 1099
68 students

NDIS Participants

Kingston (DC) (SA) LGA
46
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (146)

Disadvantage Index

3/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
119
Charity
22
Foundation
5

Gap Alert

This postcode has 146 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.