← Community Funding Map

AUBURN, VIC

3123Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: BoroondaraView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
200
Total Funding
$155.1M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
1 social & Indigenous enterprisesoperating in this area
Browse →

Top Funded Entities

$95.9M
C: $95.9M
$17.1M
C: $17.1M
$6.5M
C: $6.5M
$4.6M
C: $4.6M
$3.6M
C: $3.6M
$2.5M
C: $2.5M
AE SMITH
Company
$2.5M
G: $11K C: $2.5M
$1.8M
C: $1.8M
$973K
G: $31K C: $943K
$642K
C: $642K
$608K
G: $35K C: $573K
$445K
G: $12K C: $433K
$152K
C: $152K
$151K
C: $151K
$110K
G: $110K
$88K
C: $88K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether AUBURN, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Social & Indigenous Enterprises (1)

Mackey Lawyers Pty Ltd
senvic
Browse all in VIC →

Schools (4)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 3123. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Auburn High School
GovernmentSecondary
ICSEA 1140
849 students
Auburn South Primary School
GovernmentPrimary
ICSEA 1165
549 students
Auburn Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1162
381 students
Alia College
IndependentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1130
96 students

NDIS Participants

Boroondara (C) LGA
3,012
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (200)

Disadvantage Index

10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
145
Charity
32
Foundation
18
person
3
Govt
1
Social Enterprise
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 200 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.