← Community Funding Map

CARLTON NORTH, VIC

3054Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: MorelandView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
92
Total Funding
$3.8M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
2 social & Indigenous enterprisesoperating in this area
Browse →

Top Funded Entities

$1.2M
C: $1.2M
$546K
C: $546K
$279K
C: $279K
$255K
C: $255K
$205K
C: $205K
$168K
C: $168K
$140K
C: $140K
$113K
C: $113K
$110K
C: $110K
$107K
C: $107K
$101K
C: $101K
$97K
C: $97K
IAN RAMSAY
Company
$97K
C: $97K
$79K
C: $79K
$61K
C: $61K
$50K
C: $50K
$40K
C: $40K
$32K
C: $32K
$32K
C: $32K
$20K
G: $20K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether CARLTON NORTH, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Social & Indigenous Enterprises (2)

Kinfolk
senvic
Web
Food and beverage products
Melbourne Farmers Markets Carlton
senvic
Browse all in VIC →

Schools (3)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 3054. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Princes Hill Secondary College
GovernmentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1152
862 students
Princes Hill Primary School
GovernmentPrimary
ICSEA 1147
327 students
Carlton North Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1148
297 students

NDIS Participants

Moreland (C) LGA
4,774
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (92)

Disadvantage Index

10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
67
Charity
22
Foundation
2
Govt
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 92 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.