← Community Funding Map

Blayney, NSW

2798Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 9/10LGA: OrangeView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
15
Total Funding
$61K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
1 social & Indigenous enterprisesoperating in this area
Browse →

Top Funded Entities

BITUMEN 1
Company
$61K
C: $61K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
4,591
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
91 disability-focused enterprises in NSW

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Blayney, NSW sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In NSW
Far West49 providers
Far West51 providers
Southern NSW242 providers
Southern NSW245 providers
Captured Markets
Far West95%
Mid North Coast89%
Western NSW75%
Murrumbidgee71%

Social & Indigenous Enterprises (1)

Chocolate On Purpose
Social TradersABN 88654470452

Chocolate On Purpose offers 'Bush Food Chocolate,' blending Belgian chocolate with Australian native botanicals. Their social purpose includes supporting Indigenous farmers through increased purchases, empowering women in cocoa farming, and eradicating child labor. They also contribute to rainforest preservation and the protection of orangutans by avoiding palm oil, preventing CO2 emissions, and helping save endangered species.

Web
Food & Beverage Products
Browse all in NSW →

Schools (2)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 2798. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Millthorpe Public School
GovernmentPrimary8% Indigenous
ICSEA 1053
235 students
Spring Terrace Public School
GovernmentPrimary5% Indigenous
ICSEA 927
40 students

NDIS Participants

Orange (C) LGA
1,708
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (15)

Disadvantage Index

9/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
12
Charity
3

Gap Alert

This postcode has 15 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.