← Community Funding Map

Ingleburn, NSW

2565Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 6/10LGA: LiverpoolView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
200
Total Funding
$53.0M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$19.1M
C: $19.1M
$15.0M
G: $27K C: $15.0M
$4.3M
C: $4.3M
$2.3M
C: $2.3M
$1.7M
C: $1.7M
$1.4M
C: $1.4M
$1.2M
C: $1.2M
$1.1M
C: $1.1M
$441K
C: $441K
$410K
C: $410K
$388K
C: $388K
$307K
C: $307K
$269K
C: $269K
AWD GROUP
Company
$178K
C: $178K
$169K
C: $169K
$150K
G: $150K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
4,591
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
91 disability-focused enterprises in NSW

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Ingleburn, NSW sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In NSW
Far West49 providers
Far West51 providers
Southern NSW242 providers
Southern NSW245 providers
Captured Markets
Far West95%
Mid North Coast89%
Western NSW75%
Murrumbidgee71%

Schools (6)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 2565. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Bardia Public School
GovernmentPrimary3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1070
953 students
Denham Court Public School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1068
826 students
Ingleburn High School
GovernmentSecondary11% Indigenous
ICSEA 957
782 students
Sackville Street Public School
GovernmentPrimary13% Indigenous
ICSEA 971
474 students
Ingleburn Public School
GovernmentPrimary7% Indigenous
ICSEA 985
424 students
Holy Family Catholic Primary School
CatholicPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1066
397 students

NDIS Participants

Liverpool Plains (A) LGA
214
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (200)

Disadvantage Index

6/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
159
Charity
37
Foundation
3
Govt
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 200 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.