← Community Funding Map

BEVERLY HILLS, NSW

2209Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 3/10LGA: Canterbury-BankstownView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
88
Total Funding
$3.2M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$2.0M
C: $2.0M
$300K
C: $300K
Jason Ng
Company
$105K
C: $105K
$53K
C: $53K
$39K
C: $39K
$13K
C: $13K

Justice Funding ($12K)

THE TRUSTEE FOR THE DANA FAMILY TRUST
Catering Services · procurement
$12K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
4,591
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
91 disability-focused enterprises in NSW

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether BEVERLY HILLS, NSW sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives. This matters here because BEVERLY HILLS, NSW already shows $12K in justice-related funding moving through local entities.

Thinnest Districts In NSW
Far West49 providers
Far West51 providers
Southern NSW242 providers
Southern NSW245 providers
Captured Markets
Far West95%
Mid North Coast89%
Western NSW75%
Murrumbidgee71%

Schools (5)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 2209. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Beverly Hills Girls High School
GovernmentSecondary
ICSEA 1003
1,003 students
Regina Coeli Catholic Primary School
CatholicPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1100
637 students
Beverly Hills North Public School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1030
352 students
Beverly Hills Public School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1051
320 students
Narwee Public School
GovernmentPrimary7% Indigenous
ICSEA 1001
246 students

NDIS Participants

Canterbury-Bankstown (A) LGA
9,389
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (88)

Disadvantage Index

3/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
64
Charity
20
Foundation
2
Govt
1
Social Enterprise
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 88 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.