Dress For Success Sydney Inc
Concentration RiskAbout
Dress For Success Sydney Inc is a medium registered charity based in Summer Hill, NSW. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, ethnic groups, females, financially disadvantaged, migrants & refugees, other charities, homelessness risk, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, veterans, victims of crime, disaster victims, youth, other gender identities.
Board Interlocks (3 shared directors)
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $1.8M | $1.6M | $1.1M | $229K |
| 2022 | $1.3M | $1.6M | $831K | $-269,387 |
| 2021 | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.4M | $134K |
| 2020 | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.1M | $26K |
| 2019 | $1.2M | $1.1M | $959K | $111K |
| 2018 | $1.1M | $968K | $823K | $93K |
| 2017 | $809K | $774K | $577K | $36K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-86294993663
- ABN
- 86294993663
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (5)
- chair
- chair
- director
- officeholder
- secretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $1.8M
- Assets
- $1.1M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 18
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2130
- Locality
- SUMMER HILL
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 9/10
- LGA
- Inner West
- SA2 Region
- Haberfield - Summer Hill
- Entities in Area
- 78
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.