Coffs Harbour Regional Conservatorium
About
Coffs Harbour Regional Conservatorium is a medium registered charity based in Coffs Harbour, NSW. Its purposes include education. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, children, early childhood, ethnic groups, families, females, general community, males, disability, rural & remote, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $1.6M | $1.6M | $2.3M | $38K |
| 2022 | $1.4M | $1.5M | $2.3M | $1K |
| 2021 | $1.4M | $1.3M | $2.1M | $89K |
| 2020 | $1.0M | $1.2M | $2.2M | $18K |
| 2019 | $1.1M | $1.2M | $2.2M | $-96,287 |
| 2018 | $1.0M | $1.0M | $2.2M | $45K |
| 2017 | $1.0M | $960K | $2.2M | $75K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-92167357146
- ABN
- 92167357146
- Sector
- Education
- Website
- www.coffscon.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (9)
- Terrence Hayschair
- Alana Blackburndirector
- Anne Partridgedirector
- Chi Chung (Andrew) Woodirector
- Christena Pitmandirector
- Erica Faragdirector
- Glen Hodgesdirector
- Ian Hartcherofficeholder
- Rothwell Kristisecretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $1.6M
- Assets
- $2.3M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 11
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2450
- Locality
- BOAMBEE
- Remoteness
- Outer Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 4/10
- LGA
- Clarence Valley
- SA2 Region
- Coramba - Nana Glen - Bucca
- Entities in Area
- 579
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.