Australian Vietnamese Aged Care Services Limited
About
Australian Vietnamese Aged Care Services Limited is a large registered charity based in Smithfield, NSW. It serves: aged, ethnic groups, chronic illness, disability.
Board Interlocks (2 shared directors)
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $8.9M | $8.0M | $25.5M | $815K |
| 2022 | $7.6M | $7.1M | $18.3M | $541K |
| 2021 | $7.4M | $6.5M | $19.1M | $920K |
| 2020 | $7.6M | $6.7M | $17.8M | $972K |
| 2019 | $6.6M | $6.0M | $17.7M | $572K |
| 2018 | $708K | $641K | $18.4M | $67K |
| 2017 | $570K | $78K | $15.8M | $493K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-90633667619
- ABN
- 90633667619
- Website
- www.avacs.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (5)
- board member
- officeholder
- officeholder
- officeholder
- secretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $8.9M
- Assets
- $25.5M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 12
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2164
- Locality
- SMITHFIELD
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 1/10
- LGA
- Cumberland
- SA2 Region
- Wetherill Park Industrial
- Entities in Area
- 392
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 10% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.