Interchange Shoalhaven Limited
Concentration RiskAbout
Interchange Shoalhaven Limited is a large registered charity based in Nowra, NSW. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, children, ethnic groups, families, females, males, migrants & refugees, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, youth, other gender identities.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $10.2M | $9.1M | $5.1M | $1.1M |
| 2022 | $7.2M | $7.4M | $4.4M | $-259,390 |
| 2021 | $8.5M | $7.2M | $3.8M | $1.4M |
| 2020 | $6.9M | $5.5M | $2.4M | $1.3M |
| 2019 | $3.5M | $3.6M | $1.0M | $-194,551 |
| 2018 | $2.9M | $2.8M | $1.1M | $145K |
| 2017 | $3.1M | $3.1M | $981K | $-47,903 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-89986394578
- ABN
- 89986394578
- Sector
- Disability
- Website
- is.org.au/
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Financials
- Revenue
- $10.2M
- Assets
- $5.1M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 8
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 1 intervention and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2541
- Locality
- BANGALEE
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 2/10
- LGA
- Shoalhaven
- SA2 Region
- North Nowra - Bomaderry
- Entities in Area
- 382
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.