Australian NPC Disease Foundation Incorporated
About
Small charity, established 2009. Serves: children, young people, families, people with disabilities, people with chronic illness. Operates in: VIC.
Giving Philosophy
The foundation is driven by a mission to change the narrative for those with Niemann-Pick disease, focusing on funding research for better treatments and a cure. It values community support, advocacy, and direct assistance to affected families, aiming to provide hope and connection.
Tips for Applicants
Prospective applicants should demonstrate a direct alignment with Niemann-Pick disease research or specific support services for affected families in Australia. Emphasize impact on awareness, treatment, or quality of life for those with NPC/ASMD.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $385K | $377K | $290K | $8K |
| 2022 | $257K | $205K | $270K | $52K |
| 2021 | $226K | $264K | $196K | $-38,131 |
| 2020 | $189K | $136K | $228K | $53K |
| 2019 | $233K | $139K | $151K | $95K |
| 2018 | $64K | $60K | $69K | $3K |
| 2017 | $44K | $10K | $69K | $34K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-87767010514
- ABN
- 87767010514
- Website
- www.npcd.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Financials
- Revenue
- $385K
- Assets
- $290K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 13
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
Location Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3672
- Locality
- BENALLA
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Benalla
- SA2 Region
- Benalla
- Entities in Area
- 156
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.