Temple David Congregation Inc
About
Temple David Congregation Inc is a small registered charity based in Mount Lawley, WA. Its purposes include religion. It serves: adults, aged, children, ethnic groups, other, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $320K | $308K | $200K | $11K |
| 2022 | $363K | $335K | $1.1M | $28K |
| 2021 | $337K | $358K | $1.1M | $-21,201 |
| 2020 | $534K | $323K | $1.1M | $211K |
| 2019 | $274K | $337K | $903K | $-63,018 |
| 2018 | $277K | $343K | $867K | $-65,774 |
| 2017 | $282K | $336K | $845K | $-19,453 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-85062978252
- ABN
- 85062978252
- Sector
- Religion
- Website
- www.templedavid.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (9)
- David Mottaboard member
- Franklin Tateboard member
- Hilary Silbertboard member
- Olivia Tateboard member
- Robert Ellisboard member
- Clive Cassofficeholder
- Leslie Wilsonofficeholder
- Rick Woloznyofficeholder
- Ari Antonovskysecretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $320K
- Assets
- $200K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 17
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 6050
- Locality
- COOLBINIA
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 9/10
- LGA
- Bayswater
- SA2 Region
- Mount Lawley - Inglewood
- Entities in Area
- 159
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.