Friends Of The Animals Inc
Concentration RiskAbout
Friends Of The Animals Inc is a small registered charity. Its purposes include animal welfare. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, children, ethnic groups, families, financially disadvantaged, general community, migrants & refugees, homelessness risk, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, youth, animals.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $254K | $298K | $83K | $-13,392 |
| 2022 | $394K | $297K | $87K | $97K |
| 2021 | $300K | $308K | $29K | $-8,331 |
| 2020 | $256K | $260K | $27K | $-4,322 |
| 2019 | $226K | $237K | $21K | $-10,695 |
| 2018 | $247K | $254K | $32K | $-7,571 |
| 2017 | $237K | $245K | $48K | $-7,317 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-81851524024
- ABN
- 81851524024
- Sector
- Animal Welfare
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Financials
- Revenue
- $254K
- Assets
- $83K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 6
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 4880
- Locality
- GLEN RUSSELL
- Remoteness
- Outer Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 2/10
- LGA
- Mareeba
- SA2 Region
- Tablelands
- Entities in Area
- 203
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.