People and Parks Foundation
Giving Philosophy
The foundation values partnership approaches to developing and resourcing projects that create lasting benefits for both human health and environmental outcomes. It prioritises supporting communities where these benefits are needed most.
Tips for Applicants
Emphasise partnership elements and demonstrate how projects deliver measurable benefits to both community health and environmental outcomes. Given the small giving size, ensure proposals are appropriately scoped and clearly articulate transformative potential.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $283K | $331K | $265K | $-47,132 |
| 2022 | $340K | $339K | $312K | $910 |
| 2021 | $323K | $333K | $72K | $-9,940 |
| 2020 | $318K | $311K | $75K | $8K |
| 2019 | $295K | $332K | $52K | $-36,998 |
| 2018 | $251K | $237K | $147K | $15K |
| 2017 | $290K | $264K | $109K | $26K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-76111864389
- ABN
- 76111864389
- Sector
- health
- Website
- www.peopleandparks.org
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (7)
- chair
- director
- director
- director
- director
- director
- director
Financials
- Revenue
- $283K
- Assets
- $265K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 19
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3000
- Locality
- MELBOURNE
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 4/10
- LGA
- Melbourne
- SA2 Region
- Melbourne CBD - West
- Entities in Area
- 5,216
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.