Returned & Services League Of Australia Moura Sub Branch.
About
Returned & Services League Of Australia Moura Sub Branch. is a small registered charity based in Moura, QLD. Its purposes include health, general public, reconciliation, social welfare, security. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, families, females, financially disadvantaged, males, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, veterans.
Financial History (6 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $25K | $17K | $135K | $8K |
| 2021 | $17K | $14K | $127K | $3K |
| 2020 | $11K | $8K | $124K | $3K |
| 2019 | $28K | $26K | $118K | $1K |
| 2018 | $12K | $12K | $123K | $3K |
| 2017 | $17K | $21K | $125K | $-4,091 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-74188747966
- ABN
- 74188747966
- Sector
- Health
- Financial Year
- 2022
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (3)
- chair
- chair
- secretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $25K
- Assets
- $135K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 7
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 4718
- Locality
- Banana
- Remoteness
- Outer Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Woorabinda
- SA2 Region
- Banana
- Entities in Area
- 67
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.