Group Training South West Inc.
Concentration RiskAbout
Group Training South West Inc. is a grantmaker foundation with an estimated annual revenue of $7,223,309. Its primary focus appears to be related to vocational training and employment services, given its name and structure. However, specific details about its mission, objectives, and areas of focus are not readily available from the provided information.
Tips for Applicants
Based on the limited information available, it is advisable for potential applicants to align their proposals with vocational training, employment services, and community development. Emphasizing how the proposed project contributes to these areas may strengthen the application.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $23.5M | $23.2M | $21.6M | $301K |
| 2022 | $24.2M | $24.3M | $21.5M | $-44,914 |
| 2021 | $23.9M | $23.3M | $21.4M | $611K |
| 2020 | $28.5M | $27.9M | $20.6M | $670K |
| 2019 | $25.3M | $24.8M | $20.2M | $514K |
| 2018 | $20.9M | $20.7M | $19.1M | $212K |
| 2017 | $21.0M | $20.9M | $18.9M | $141K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-69901418015
- ABN
- 69901418015
- Sector
- education
- Website
- www.gtsw.com.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Financials
- Revenue
- $23.5M
- Assets
- $21.6M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 9
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
Location Intelligence
- Postcode
- 6230
- Locality
- South Bunbury - Bunbury
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Dardanup
- SA2 Region
- South Bunbury - Bunbury
- Entities in Area
- 482
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.