St Brendan Shaw Catholic College
About
St Brendan Shaw Catholic College is a large registered charity based in Devonport, TAS. Its purposes include education, religion. It serves: first nations, ethnic groups, females, financially disadvantaged, males, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, rural & remote, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | $13.5M | $13.6M | $31.6M | $-156,539 |
| 2021 | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | $12.8M | $12.3M | — | $494K |
| 2019 | $12.0M | $11.8M | — | $151K |
| 2018 | $11.7M | $11.6M | — | $125K |
| 2017 | $11.7M | $11.6M | — | $61K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-64137590249
- ABN
- 64137590249
- Sector
- Education
- Website
- www.sbsc.tas.edu.au/
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (3)
- Christopher Ryanboard member
- Weerasuriya Pereraboard member
- Mark Fr Freemantrustee
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 3
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 7310
- Locality
- Devonport
- Remoteness
- Outer Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 2/10
- LGA
- Latrobe (Tas.)
- SA2 Region
- Devonport
- Entities in Area
- 310
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.