ELDER ABUSE ACTION AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Concentration RiskAbout
ELDER ABUSE ACTION AUSTRALIA LIMITED is a medium registered charity based in Chippendale, NSW. Its purposes include education, health, law & policy, reconciliation, social welfare. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, ethnic groups, families, females, financially disadvantaged, general community, males, migrants & refugees, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, rural & remote, victims of crime, other gender identities.
Government Funding ($55K)
Top Contracts (top 5)
Financial History (3 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $1.4M | $1.4M | $259K | $21K |
| 2022 | $1.5M | $1.6M | $352K | $-57,627 |
| 2021 | $1.4M | $1.4M | $993K | $51K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-58625915835
- ABN
- 58625915835
- Sector
- Health
- Website
- www.eaaa.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (8)
- Claire van Heyningenboard member
- Diedre Timmsboard member
- Helen Wallaceboard member
- Medha Gunawardanaboard member
- Tara Simpsonboard member
- Rebecca Edwardschair
- Susan Leitchchair
- Graeme Tolhurstofficeholder
Financials
- Revenue
- $1.4M
- Assets
- $259K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 25
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2008
- Locality
- Chippendale
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 7/10
- LGA
- Sydney
- SA2 Region
- Chippendale
- Entities in Area
- 170
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.