AUSTRALIAN FOUNDATION FOR CDKL5 RESEARCH LIMITED
Giving Philosophy
This foundation's giving is highly focused on supporting initiatives related to CDKL5 deficiency disorder. It values scientific research, patient support, and community awareness efforts that aim to improve the lives of those affected by this specific neurological condition. Recipients are likely selected based on their direct impact on CDKL5 research, treatment, or support services.
Tips for Applicants
Applicants should clearly demonstrate how their project or initiative directly addresses CDKL5 deficiency disorder, whether through research, support services, or advocacy. Proposals should align with improving outcomes for individuals and families affected by CDKL5 across Australia.
Financial History (2 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $733K | $724K | $81K | $9K |
| 2022 | $223K | $269K | $32K | $-45,551 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-55650498954
- ABN
- 55650498954
- Sector
- indigenous
- Website
- www.afcr.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (3)
- Daryl Moraleschair
- Jordan Muhwezidirector
- Simone Leembruggendirector
Financials
- Revenue
- $733K
- Assets
- $81K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 3
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3215
- Locality
- BELL PARK
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 4/10
- LGA
- Greater Geelong
- SA2 Region
- North Geelong - Bell Park
- Entities in Area
- 212
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.