Merredin Churches Fraternal Incorporated
About
Merredin Churches Fraternal Incorporated is a small registered charity based in Merredin, WA. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, children, ethnic groups, families, females, financially disadvantaged, males, other, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, veterans, victims of crime, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $3K | $2K | $8K | $1K |
| 2022 | $2K | $1K | $3K | $950 |
| 2021 | $230 | — | $2K | $230 |
| 2020 | $2K | — | $4K | $2K |
| 2019 | $475 | — | $4K | $475 |
| 2018 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | $3K | $3K | $2K | $-6 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-48838873652
- ABN
- 48838873652
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (4)
- Mark Beadlechair
- Pedro Cruzchair
- Jane Patroniofficeholder
- Sue Rileysecretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $3K
- Assets
- $8K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 6
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 6415
- Locality
- NORPA
- Remoteness
- Remote Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Merredin
- SA2 Region
- Merredin
- Entities in Area
- 66
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.