Uniting Church Naracoorte
About
Uniting Church Naracoorte is a small registered charity based in Naracoorte, SA. Its purposes include religion. It serves: adults, families, financially disadvantaged, general community, homelessness risk, disability, disaster victims, youth.
Board Interlocks (2 shared directors)
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $143K | $120K | — | $23K |
| 2022 | $124K | $97K | $25K | $27K |
| 2021 | $145K | $137K | — | $8K |
| 2020 | $239K | $137K | $225K | $102K |
| 2019 | $176K | $131K | — | $45K |
| 2018 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | — | — | — | — |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-45427853998
- ABN
- 45427853998
- Sector
- Religion
- Website
- naracoorteuca.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (6)
- board member
- board member
- board member
- board member
- chair
- officeholder
Financials
- Revenue
- $143K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 18
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 5271
- Locality
- Naracoorte
- Remoteness
- Outer Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Wattle Range
- SA2 Region
- Naracoorte
- Entities in Area
- 104
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.