Tasmanian Foundation for Occupational Medicine Inc.
Giving Philosophy
Provides targeted support to occupational medicine trainees and training practices in Tasmania, prioritising candidates committed to practicing in the state. Values专业 development, mentorship, and building localised expertise in occupational and environmental medicine.
Tips for Applicants
Applicants should demonstrate a commitment to practicing occupational medicine in Tasmania and align with AFOEM training standards. Focus on clearly articulating how funding will build local workforce capacity.
Financial History (3 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $1K | $1K | $3K | $267 |
| 2022 | $5K | $6K | $3K | $-1,111 |
| 2021 | $16K | $14K | $4K | $2K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-36395869483
- ABN
- 36395869483
- Sector
- education
- Website
- www.tfom.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (7)
- officeholder
- officeholder
- officeholder
- officeholder
- other
- secretary
- secretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $1K
- Assets
- $3K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 18
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 7250
- Locality
- Launceston
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 4/10
- LGA
- Meander Valley
- SA2 Region
- Launceston
- Entities in Area
- 667
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.