Members Church of God International Australia
About
The Members Church of God International Australia is a philanthropic organization that appears to be associated with a religious group, likely focusing its efforts on community and religious development. The foundation's estimated annual size is around $2,722,354, indicating a significant capacity for grantmaking. However, specific details about their activities and goals are not readily available.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $3.2M | $3.2M | $1.4M | $14K |
| 2022 | $3.7M | $3.7M | $1.2M | $88K |
| 2021 | $3.2M | $3.3M | $530K | $36K |
| 2020 | $3.6M | $3.2M | $667K | $457K |
| 2019 | $2.7M | $2.4M | $256K | $215K |
| 2018 | $2.7M | $2.7M | $48K | $29K |
| 2017 | $2.8M | $3.0M | $8K | $-124,933 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-26629185235
- ABN
- 26629185235
- Sector
- community
- Website
- mcgi.org.au/
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (4)
- director
- director
- director
- secretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $3.2M
- Assets
- $1.4M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 8
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3025
- Locality
- ALTONA EAST
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 3/10
- LGA
- Hobsons Bay
- SA2 Region
- Altona North
- Entities in Area
- 154
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.