Sailability Tasmania Incorporated
About
Sailability Tasmania Incorporated is a small registered charity based in Sandy Bay, TAS. Its purposes include general public, social welfare. It serves: adults, aged, families, females, financially disadvantaged, general community, males, chronic illness, disability, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $33K | $39K | $73K | $-5,948 |
| 2022 | $34K | $27K | $79K | $7K |
| 2021 | $19K | $28K | $72K | $-9,509 |
| 2020 | $30K | $32K | $81K | $-1,474 |
| 2019 | $74K | $46K | $90K | $28K |
| 2018 | $28K | $24K | $70K | $4K |
| 2017 | $27K | $25K | $132K | $17K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-24456336156
- ABN
- 24456336156
- Sector
- Social Welfare
- Website
- sailabilitytas.org/
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (7)
- Alan Championofficeholder
- Bela Somssichofficeholder
- Chris Symondsofficeholder
- Stephen McElweeofficeholder
- Julie Pearsonother
- Alan Championpublic officer
- Alan Championsecretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $33K
- Assets
- $73K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 8
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 7005
- Locality
- DYNNYRNE
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 8/10
- LGA
- Hobart
- SA2 Region
- Sandy Bay
- Entities in Area
- 201
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.