The Shepparton Men's Shed
About
The Shepparton Men's Shed is a small registered charity based in Shepparton, VIC. Its purposes include health, social welfare. It serves: adults, aged, ethnic groups, financially disadvantaged, males, homelessness risk, disability, rural & remote, unemployed.
Board Interlocks (1 shared directors)
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $4K | $3K | $126K | $623 |
| 2022 | $8K | $9K | $136K | $-1,238 |
| 2021 | $5K | $3K | $126K | $2K |
| 2020 | $11K | $5K | $114K | $7K |
| 2019 | $10K | $8K | $116K | $2K |
| 2018 | $4K | $10K | $113K | $-6,729 |
| 2017 | $11K | $8K | $114K | $3K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-23976044653
- ABN
- 23976044653
- Sector
- Health
- Website
- www.mensshed.org
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (1)
- officeholder
Financials
- Revenue
- $4K
- Assets
- $126K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 4
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3630
- Locality
- BENARCH
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 1/10
- LGA
- Greater Shepparton
- SA2 Region
- Shepparton Surrounds - East
- Entities in Area
- 430
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 10% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.