Chelsea Community Support Service Inc
About
Chelsea Community Support Service Inc is a small registered charity based in Chelsea, VIC. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, children, ethnic groups, families, females, financially disadvantaged, general community, males, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, veterans, victims of crime, disaster victims, youth, other gender identities.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $246K | $234K | $170K | $13K |
| 2022 | $220K | $240K | $154K | $-20,089 |
| 2021 | $235K | $203K | $173K | $34K |
| 2020 | $165K | $187K | $136K | $-22,424 |
| 2019 | $192K | $99K | $137K | $93K |
| 2018 | $194K | $121K | $126K | $73K |
| 2017 | $170K | $154K | $127K | $16K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-19366414059
- ABN
- 19366414059
- Sector
- Community
- Website
- www.chelsea.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (2)
- officeholder
- officeholder
Financials
- Revenue
- $246K
- Assets
- $170K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 10
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 3196
- Locality
- BONBEACH
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 8/10
- LGA
- Kingston (Vic.)
- SA2 Region
- Chelsea - Bonbeach
- Entities in Area
- 174
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.